judge for yourself ............... Options

[Lorelie]

Hi all BGers!
I was curious about what all the fussing was about so I just had to go to GPTB and read it for myself. I must say I was totally amused at some of the comments! The ones that stated that the majority of the emails were sent out for 0 cents were the ones that caught my eye! Um.... aren't we supposed to READ them ? I do believe most of the paid to READ sites require that ! I really don't think I would want members that just click and don't read the emails or maybe they don't know how ! Anyway, just wanted to make my opinion known! Good job with BG and thanks!

[halexzo]

Hi all BGers!
I was curious about what all the fussing was about so I just had to go to GPTB and read it for myself. I must say I was totally amused at some of the comments! The ones that stated that the majority of the emails were sent out for 0 cents were the ones that caught my eye! Um.... aren't we supposed to READ them ? I do believe most of the paid to READ sites require that ! I really don't think I would want members that just click and don't read the emails or maybe they don't know how ! Anyway, just wanted to make my opinion known! Good job with BG and thanks!

Hello Lorelie

You exactly right, BG is a PAID TO READ site, not just blindly clicking away and those who complained, well they seem to be just to lazy to bother.

Their lose and as far as posting at that circus, well, that place is nothing than a breeding ground for disgruntled members (full of lies and false accusations) who either did not follow the rules to begin with or like you said , did not read their mails and want to get back at the PO....


Have a nice day,

halexzo

[Lorelie]

Thank you for your reply, halexzo. I have occasionally gone to THAT site but since I judge ptr's by the way I'm treated, well you know what they can do with their opinions! You have a nice day too!

p.s. I love that dove!

[yokoda]

Boycott is showing again and again the true colours of their Attitude, Rules and Hidden Agenda's
NOT ONLY TO BGPM, but to many other sites
If you go read there sometimes trough the years you can see a patern devolped into a path
Once they got a site in their visier the hunting down can start.
When the hunting has start the victum usual trap into the fall the yset for him/her
They go to THAT FORUM to defend theirselfs or the site
Once you are there soon the attaques, the slander and the insults starts.
Droven into the corner (calling defence and stand up ) by provocation they found reasons to fill in formal complaints.
They go straight to the HIDDEN AND SECRET FORUM for topcontributers , nothing more then a secret JUDGE without the rights to defend yourself or your site
Even in todays court of justice a suspect has RIGHTS. A suspect is inocent till proofed wrong. A suspect is written and pointed to HIS rights even before he is taken in arrest. He has also right to defend hiself with help of a lawyer
BUT NOT AT BOYCOTT
Althought they hide behind titels in a attempt to impress, EX-cop, Ex- judge, IRS helper They are nothing more then a FRAUD

From todays posts

I agree Seraph and I have reported his posts for being rude and using foul language. He is also attempting to back seat Mod and we all know that is a no-no (well at least those of us that read the rules before spouting off).

If you are trying to support a site you like then good for you...but acting like a child and using foul language just makes you look bad.

Based on what I have seen here from several people and the bad attitude of the site owner, I am filing a formal complaint right now.

We kept saying it for long time now BASED ON WHAT I HAVE SEEN OR HEARED FROM

What a nitwits

yokoda

[Donna]

EXACTLY, yok!

Here's a clincher:

Originally Posted by joshrenf

...If it wasn't the same 3 to 5 people complaining in all of the forums, I would have no problem with the complaining. But you see, the same 3 to 5 people are all I see. I will make it very clear, people will gain absolutely nothing in LIFE by complaining about everything.

It's NEVER the "many" complaints, but, the FEW, out of mostly thousands of members that complain at all the forums they can, just to "stir" up things.

And, most times they give NO PROOF of what they claim.

And, THAT fits VERY WELL into my conclusion that this (group) of boycotters join programs under different user names just so they can "appear" as unknown claimers "newly" joining GPTB and other forums just to complain.

Yep, yok, it's ALL a set up to trap any member into defending a program. Once there, they utilize the bashing, derailing into personal attack to get "off the topic" so that the defender get's off topic, etc., etc. to the point where the common "logic" is lost in the shuffle.

And, it also fits that GPTB only NEEDS 10 complaints to boycott - not to mention there's no rule that you have to be a "member" of the designated program to be able to submit a complaint.

Just get the discussion going, and "everything just falls into place."

Yep, yok, same old pattern...............

[Donna]

Get a load of pietro, answering to a proposal made by alexdan22 in the "Future of GPTBoycott.com":

LINK

...There is little or nothing this forum, as an entity, could do legally due to the fact the forum, as an entity, is not being harmed. We could not file a suit on your behalf because we have no vested interest in what the program owner is doing. We are what we are basically (and I hate this phrase) "out of the goodness of our hearts". We, as a unit, are trying to help people expose bad and good programs. We have no legal standing in any court in terms of aiding the return of funds or preventing the insults that might be made to individuals by other individuals. Our only obligation is to prevent insults and mockery here on the forum to the best of our ability.

They "help" people expose "bad and good programs" out of the "goodness" of their hearts?

And, their "only obligation is to PREVENT insults and mockery" on their forum "to the best of our (their) ability?"

WHAT A CROCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just this last November 4, 2009, pietro said:

Re: Should a Top Contributor's status be removed?

I'll tell you the same thing I tell my 3 year old grandsons. Two wrongs don't make a right. Never have, never will.

So, here we have a "super moderator," who claims to be an ex judge who couldn't keep from talking to an adult as if they were a 3-year-old?

I consider the above a personal insult; it demeans the poster rather than the post, turning an opinion on an issue into personal insult.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...............

[halexzo]

Get a load of pietro, answering to a proposal made by alexdan22 in the "Future of GPTBoycott.com":

LINK

...There is little or nothing this forum, as an entity, could do legally due to the fact the forum, as an entity, is not being harmed. We could not file a suit on your behalf because we have no vested interest in what the program owner is doing. We are what we are basically (and I hate this phrase) "out of the goodness of our hearts". We, as a unit, are trying to help people expose bad and good programs. We have no legal standing in any court in terms of aiding the return of funds or preventing the insults that might be made to individuals by other individuals. Our only obligation is to prevent insults and mockery here on the forum to the best of our ability.

They "help" people expose "bad and good programs" out of the "goodness" of their hearts?

And, their "only obligation is to PREVENT insults and mockery" on their forum "to the best of our (their) ability?"

WHAT A CROCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Just this last November 4, 2009, pietro said:

Re: Should a Top Contributor's status be removed?

I'll tell you the same thing I tell my 3 year old grandsons. Two wrongs don't make a right. Never have, never will.

So, here we have a "super moderator," who claims to be an ex judge who couldn't keep from talking to an adult as if they were a 3-year-old?

I consider the above a personal insult; it demeans the poster rather than the post, turning an opinion on an issue into personal insult.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm...............

Yup Donna, had adressed that same subject earlier today:


Pietro


To me, he always seems to talk down to others, guess he forgot he put his pants on the same way others do, one leg at a time.....

[Donna]

Ah, yes, that's a good one, too. How did I miss that, lol, or your post? Eeeeeeeeeeeeeek, I must be falling asleep reading over there.

Pietro's so good at sticking his foot in his mouth it bares repeating here, lol. Thanks again for the quote, hale. :

However, there is nothing in the law that says I cannot mock another citizen as long as my action does not do him any physical or monitary harm.

Care for a little mocking, yourself, pietro? I promise it won't do any "physical or monitary" harm.


Ok, let's all sing along to the tune of "Old Macdonald Had a Farm:"

Old man pietro loves to mock
E I E I O
Bash and rudeness is his game
E I E I O
Mock mock here
Ridicule there
Here a bash
There a sneer
Everwhere a mock mock
Old man pietro loves to mock
E I E I O

Hmmmmmmmmm, wonder if I posted the above over there if it would be deleted by pietro, the great moderator?

Forgive me, folks. It's after midnight here and supposed to snow. And, like an excited 3-year-old (oops, where did I hear that?) I have to play until I see the first snow flake.

[halexzo]

Just to funny.....


'mon3ymaking' left a review at Seraph's site (gptreview) about piggybankgpt:

not a good site.
i am really sorry but this site SUCKS. like not trying to be mean, but it forreal sucks. i have no doubt the person before me either was paid, as in an offer to write that, or is the actual owner. the owner of that site spams on freaking EVERYWHERE trying to advertise his site pretending hes just a member. its just annoying. im sorry. it really is. i joined, you know, like tried to check it out, people are so obnoxious. also the offers pay way less than other sites.
sorry piggybankgpt, your out.
Reviewed By: mon3ymaking

Well, seems the Owner of that site replied to her:

Do not slander my website
Sent at: Tue Mar 23, 2010 9:41 pm
From: tjq86
To: mon3ymaking
Do not lie about stuff that isn't true. I do not make posts pretending to be a member on other forums this is a LIE. You did NOT sign up to my site and our staff is very friendly and not "obnoxious".

So mon3ymaking notified Seraph of this and got the following reply from seraph herself:

Hi, as you can see on GPTReview, the only thing published on the site is whichever username you post under, and the review. I never share information with site owners, and especially would not with that particular site.

You are supposed to be posting honest reviews. In fact, I'd almost say that if he's acting like that and trying to intimidate you, that you should post about it both on my site and on gptboycott.com. Take screenshots....and post them.

Let me know if you need anything else.

Sincerely,
Seraph
GPTReview.net Admin

LINK


Seraph, you have got to be kidding, right?

You and NOT sharing private info with site owners?

Have you forgotten that infamous chat you attended?

Where private info was shared in there and how others were made fun off and such in which you were pretty active in too......

Get real.....................

For your and others a little refresher:


Infamous Chat



Right after, Taff had this to say, replying (editing) to 'norradjer99'post:

norradjer99
PiggyBankGPT is not a scam now <edited> check the guide reviews, your the only <edited> that wrote a bad review.

Last edited by Taff; 4 Days Ago at 21:01.

< The forum is open to all ages so please modify your language >

LINK



more bull coming from that circus, seems 'they' (talking about the judge/jurror and excecutioner team) all forgot those vulgar, nasty, inciting etc... post's (certainly not for ALL ages) that merlin and a 'few' others had posted there and all was allowed to stay as is.....


Double standard at the circus

Of course it is, has been and is, STILL...............

BEWARE of 'Get Paid To boycot',they are NOT what they proclaim to be,
They have NO CREDIBILITY, NO AUTHORITY & most importantly, NO LICENSE to do what they do